An online magazine focusing on professional road cycling

Thursday, April 15

Excel Sports Boulder

  Daily News
  Interviews / Profiles
  Peloton Stories
  Features
  Smart Training
  Tech Smart
  Letters


  World Cup
  Giro d'Italia
  Tour de France
  Vuelta a España
  US Pro Cycling


  Home
  Advertise with us
  Excel Sports
  About us





Rotor Cranks
Pure Cycling Innovation

 From:  Gary Tingley - Wednesday, September 24, 2003

Rotor Cranks ™, or officially the Rotor System ™ (RS for short), is an innovative pedaling system that eliminates the dead spot in a cyclist's pedal rotation. This is done by varying the angle of the cranks from a traditional 6 o'clock/12 o'clock to a 6 o'clock/1 o'clock during every pedal revolution. To accomplish this, the cyclist must increase power on the drive side leg to propel the non-drive side leg past the dead spot and into the 1 o'clock position. Using cams and struts, the cranks move a bit slower downwards and a bit faster upwards, as shown in this simulator.


The Rotor Cranks
Click to enlarge

Always on the look out for new time trial equipment, I ran across a discussion about Rotor Cranks on a cycling bulletin board. Richard Burkholder recently started using Rotor Cranks and wrote that he had just competed in the Sandy Hook time trial and finished second overall - far exceeding his expectations for his first time trial on the Rotors. He went on to say that he was riding faster than ever, and setting new personal records (PR) on all his time trial courses. I did a little research, read a few articles on the web (which really are not detailed enough to do the Rotors justice), asked around, and decided to contact Rotor USA to ask a few questions about reliability and their 30-day Guarantee.

After a terrific and informative conversation with Howie Cohen, an international consultant in the bicycle industry and Rotor USA distributor, I was on my way to getting 'Rotorized'. I decided to write this review to share my experience and answer questions many time trial racers and triathletes have about the Rotors: Do they really work? Are they hard to get adjusted to? What kind of benefits can I expect? Do they fatigue your legs? What about my heart rate level? I have bad knees, will they help me?

Rotor History

The concept for Rotor Cranks was designed by Aeronautical Engineering students in Madrid, 1995. Engineering began in 1998. The company gained UCI approval for the system soon thereafter. The system has recently had many successes with the company's European pro road, multisport and MTB teams. RS scientific testing has also been proven to relieve knee pain associated with cycling and to lower cyclists heart rates and lactate levels in the blood.

Rotor Cranks are not the first physical technique or mechanical system that has attempted to remove the dead spot from pedaling. A method of pedaling known as 'ankling', or Anquetil's method, was popular in the 1960's and was thought to be the solution to cycling efficiency until an Italian study on ankling found that ankling was 'useless' and did not benefit the cyclist. In the 1980's Shimano introduced elliptical Biopace ™ chainrings in an attempt to reduce the dead spot in a pedal rotation. The popularity of these chainrings faded amongst poor shifting and allegations of associated knee injuries. Other crank systems currently on the market may claim to 'round out' a cyclists pedal stroke and help to make a cyclist pedal in circles, but they do not eliminate the dead spot from the pedal stroke like Rotor Cranks do.

Installation

When you receive your RS, there will be a large notice on the box. Read it. Have your mechanic read it. What is it? In the past, mechanics and 'mechanic-wannabes' have installed the cranks as they would a traditional crankset. Wrong. The RS will not function properly unless the procedures are followed step-by-step.

In my case, I learned this the hard way. I had to take my bike to two different shops to finally get the cranks installed correctly. Although I provided the first mechanic with the detailed Rotor installation instructions, he refused to follow them and installed the cranks without setting the regulation point. The cranks were unrideable and had to be removed. The second (and my new) mechanic followed the instructions completely and had the cranks up and running in 45 minutes. It's not that the installation is difficult or that special tools are needed, all that is required is the ability to follow a few important steps in the install process. Installation should run you around $30. I felt that having a professional install the cranks was well worth my time, considering the cost of the cranks. Very important: do not ride the cranks for 24 hours after installation to allow the thread locker to dry.

My RS included beautifully machined crank arms, an integrated Ti bottom bracket and anodized aluminum ramped and pinned chainrings. The workmanship is top notch and rivals the best bicycle component machine works I have seen from Japan, Western Europe and America. My kit weighed 1200gms, 450 gms more than my comparable Dura Ace ™ crankset and bottom bracket.


The Rotor cranks, installed.
Click to enlarge

30-Day Testing

I decided to try the cranks for one month before offering a review of them. This was the recommended 'break in' time for the system. I had two time trial races scheduled about one month apart from each other and decided to use the first race as a benchmark and the second race as an indication of my improvement using the cranks. The two races were held on the same course, a ten-mile circuit with calm winds and moderate temperatures. The first race was completed on Shimano cranks in 23:18 at a 25.75 MPH average speed at a 92% max heart rate average. After the race I took my bike to the shop to have the Rotor Cranks installed.

My review of Rotor Cranks is limited to experiences on my time trial bike, on time trial (flattish) courses. I did not do very much climbing with them but I can say that Rotor pedaling felt natural when ascending. Cornering was very easy and natural as well. The only subtle differences in feel between traditional cranks and Rotor Cranks are out of the saddle pedaling and back-pedaling.

Week 1 Log Entry - Strange Ground

It is hard to describe the feeling of riding the Rotor Cranks for the first time, try and imagine that there is no dead spot in your pedal rotation. My first ride was a 3.5-hour cruise on my time trial bike. I spent the first 30 minutes of the ride adjusting my cadence and getting a feel for the new cranks. After 30 minutes of pedaling I did not notice the initial strange feeling any longer. After an hour on the new cranks, and a pretty good warm up, I decided to put them to an initial test and run them through a 20k time trial. The results were fantastic. I had gone faster than even before in training and set a new 20k 'training' time trial PR. I did notice that I was pushing a larger gear than normal, and that my heart rate held steady at 85% of my max heat rate (MHR), despite my best efforts to get my heart rate up to 90% of my MHR.

On a recovery ride the next day I felt that my legs were more sore than usual after a training TT. I suspect that this is due to the increased gear and slightly lower cadence that I was using. I was using a larger gear in part because I could maintain constant power and keep the chainring moving without getting stuck on top of the dead spot.

Week 2 Log Entry - Riding at Lactate Threshold

Second week - 70-mile ride. I do most of my training on my road bike and about a third of it on my time trial bike, on which the Rotors are installed. The strange feeling only lasted about 20 minutes this time. Once I was warmed up, I proceeded to go for another 20k time trial. My concern was my heart rate. I was not able to get it to race levels on my previous Rotor ride and I wanted to see if I could get it back up to normal levels during this training session.

During my three lap training time trial I was able to maintain 85% MHR for the first two laps. On the final lap I gave it everything I had and got my heart rate up to 90% MHR for the final 10 minutes. During this final lap I could feel my legs working harder than ever, pushing a larger gear at my race cadence of 90 RPM. I was riding just below my lactate threshold (LT). I finished the time trial with a new personal record for the final lap and had gone faster than ever before in that final lap, even faster than in any race up to that point. I know that the Rotors are working; I just have to get my legs used to pushing the larger gears with my normal 90 RPM cadence, and get my HR back up to 90% MHR. I should be able to get my heart rate up to 90%+ MHR in a real time trial, which is sometimes harder to do in a 'training time trial'.

Week 3 Log Entry - C'mon Legs

Back again, another 3.5-hour session on the Rotor Cranks, hey, the 'strange' feeling is gone! Today I realized (assumed?) what is going on with my heart rate. Because there is no longer a dead spot in my pedal stroke, I now find myself pedaling a larger gear. Now that I have constant power going to the drive train I no longer have the "paused" feeling that I used to get with a larger gear when pedaling through the dead spot. I do not get "stuck" on top of the larger gear. Since I am pedaling a larger gear, I have lowered my cadence slightly to compensate for the increased demands on my legs.

My heart rate is telling me that I can really put out much more effort to the pedals, but my legs are saying, "hold on a minute!" What I need to do is to slowly increase my cadence back up to 90 RPMs, back to race levels, and keep the same high gearing. After my last session with the Rotors, I found that I was much faster riding at just below my LT than I was riding at around 85% of my MHR. The difference between the two heart rate levels is about 10 beats. Now as I increase my cadence my leg muscles must bear the additional propulsion burden, my heart rate has room to spare: 'all systems go'.

This week (following my 3rd training session) I feel slightly fatigued. I cannot directly attribute it to the Rotor Cranks but I suspect that the fatigue may be related to the additional workload from my recent training sessions. I hope to be recovered by the end of this week for the time trial this weekend.

Week 4 Log Entry - Time Trial

In a time trial, I can never estimate my results or how I will perform during the race. Factors such as weather, training, sleep, diet and fatigue seem to all play a role in deciding the outcome. Today, leg strength played the deciding factor. I was unable to ride the higher "Rotorized" gearing for the entire race. I felt that my leg muscles had not yet completely adjusted to the new power demands that the Rotors bring. For the first 9 laps I rode at 90% MHR (my normal racing heart rate is 92% MHR) in my normal gearing at 90 RPMs .

Feeling that I could manage an increased power output for the final three laps, I increased my gearing and my heart rate raised accordingly from 90% MHR to my normal racing heart rate of 92% MHR. My lap times for those final three laps decreased by 4 seconds per lap, or about 12 seconds total. I finished the race in 23:07, 11 seconds faster than my previous race using standard cranks. I believe that the 11 seconds difference for my new fastest time were gained in those final three laps.

In my estimation, if I were to ride the entire race at the same speed of my final three laps (26.64 MPH), I would have finished the race an additional 36 seconds faster, or in 22:31. This difference in time from the first race (23:18) would have been 47 seconds for the 10 mile effort. Converting the speed gains to a 40 kilometer race, my time would equate to 118 seconds, or about 2 minutes faster for the 40k event. I believe that as I build my leg strength, I will be able to appreciate all the benefits that Rotor Cranks offer. To this point I have ridden the cranks approximately 220 miles. At my current progression rate, I should be able to finish building my leg strength and realize full potential of the cranks in the following weeks.

2003 Rotor Cranks Price List - Road - (MSRP)

The Rotor System is available in both English (BSA) and Italian (ITA) thread models for road and mountain bikes. Also, within these two types of threads, the road bike version is available in double and triple chainring models which can be installed on all road and mountain bike frames:

RS03 STEEL ROAD-DOUBLE, 53/39, ENGLISH OR ITALIAN, SPECIFY CRANK LENGTH $640.00
RS03 STEEL ROAD/MOUNTAIN* TRIPLE, 53/39/30, ENGLISH OR ITALIAN, SPECIFY CRANK LENGTH $675.00
RS03 TITANIUM ROAD-DOUBLE, 53/39, ENGLISH OR ITALIAN, SPECIFY CRANK LENGTH $830.00
RS03 TITANIUM ROAD/MOUNTAIN* TRIPLE, 53/39/30, ENGLISH OR ITALIAN, SPECIFY CRANK LENGTH $865.00
CRANK LENGTHS AVAILABLE: 170mm, 172.5mm, 175mm & 180mm. (165mm IN OCTOBER-2003)
CHAINRING UPGRADE FOR ROAD OUTER, 54T OR 55T IN LIEU OF 53T $40.00
CHAINRING UPGRADE FOR ROAD INNER, 44T or 46T (w/o pins-ramps) IN LIEU OF 39T $24.00
CHAINRING UPGRADE FOR ROAD INNER, 36T (w/o pins-ramps) IN LIEU OF 39T NO CHARGE
*Mountain Bike Rotor Systems are supplied with 44/34/24 or 46/34/24 chainrings

You can order your Rotor Cranks Concept Kit through your local bicycle retailer or directly from Rotor. The Rotor website is http://www.rotorbike.com/. In USA & UK, contact howie@rotorbike.com.

30 Day Money Back Satisfaction Guarantee

Rotor believes that you will find the RS so effective that they offer a 30 day satisfaction money back guarantee. You have 30 days to decide, based upon your own results, whether they have worked for you. Rotor writes on their web site "Test the Rotor System, and if you are not satisfied with it, we give you your money back. Rotor offers you a unique opportunity to experience the benefits provided by this revolutionary product. We offer you a 30 days money-back guarantee if you are not satisfied with it. Contact your dealer and ask how to join this promotion." Regulation Points

There are five different regulation points referenced (marked) on the RS. The factory suggests: that riders start on the #3 regulation point, which is when the two triangles are pointing at each other. Then after about 200 miles change the regulation point to #4, which is one point below the triangle. Then after another 200 miles change the regulation point to #2, which is one point above the triangle. Each different regulation point gives a different feeling and the best regulation point’ for one cyclist is not always the same as for another cyclist. Once a cyclist has found the regulation point that is perfect for him/her, he/she can obtain the maximum benefit and performance from the RS. For example, Rotor has found that on flat courses & on the track, most cyclists prefer the higher regulation points such as #2 or #1. On courses with climbs, the lower regulation points (#3, 4 or even 5) are most oftenly preferred. The reference marks on the RS do not need to lined up exactly; they are only reference points for guidance.

Maintenance

According to Rotor "Properly maintaining the Rotor System is very simple and only limited to NOT using pressure washers. In addition to avoiding pressure washers, it is suggested that the links be greased periodically, every 2-3 months if the Rotor System is used in normal, dry conditions. If continually exposed to water, streams, mud or rain, it is strongly recommended that the links be greased more frequently."

Finishing Up

I want to thank Howie Cohen at Rotor for giving me the opportunity to test the cranks and for his support throughout the installation process, even on a Saturday morning (sorry Howie)! You will be glad to know that Rotor's customer service and support is top notch, which is very important to cyclists and triathletes who rely on their race gear heavily. According to Howie, Rotor has had almost no warranty issues with their products. However, if repairs should arise, they have a U.S. repair facility along with the headquarters facility in Spain and offer FedEx express repair service to keep you up and running.

The Rotors are not the first 'advanced' crank system I have tried that has 'guaranteed' performance results. My experiences with other 'innovative' crank systems left me, initially, a bit skeptical of the Rotor performance claims, which are quite substantial. I know that the difference of 2 minutes in a 40 kilometer time trial can be the difference between 1st and 10th place, and for me to go 2 minutes faster in a race just by switching out my cranks seemed ... well it seemed to good to be true.

I learned that there is nothing free in life, even speed on your bicycle. Rotor Cranks require a cyclist to pedal constantly by eliminating the dead spot in the pedal rotation. By doing so, the cranks allow a lower heart rate, larger gearing and lower cadence at a slightly higher speed.

When the cyclist becomes accustomed to the new muscular demands of constant pedalling (always applying power downwards) the cyclist can then focus on raising the gearing and cadence which in turn raises the heart rate back up to race levels. When the cyclist brings his cadence and heart rate back up to normal levels, he will be cycling faster than ever before. The newfound speed comes from the increased gearing and the elimination of the dead spot in the pedal rotation (continuous applied power). Your results may vary, but from what I have experienced, you will likely see performance gains in your very first ride.

Rotor Cranks work, plain and simple. They work very well, and I am faster than ever before.

You can learn more about the RS at the Rotor web site.

Copyright © 2004 bike.com All Rights Reserved